Sunday, February 17, 2013

Reflections - Hariovla Jose 11140


The new understanding of the Church in the encyclical Mystici Corporis Christi as James O. McGovern explained it his book[1]
During the Counter Reformation, the Catholic Church was in an apologetic and polemic position. The visible and institutional aspect of the Church gained more attention than the divine grace which enables everybody to be member of the Mystical Church. Thus, to be member of the Catholic Church was especially reserved to those who were baptized and accepted the papal authority. The Church took such position in order to counter the Protestantism’s view of the Church which put less stress on the visible aspect of it.
We wait until 19th century that the theology of the Mystical Body was explored. This new theology was decisive in defining the Church and its membership, although, some theologians went to the extreme by emphasizing only the interior aspect of the Church. In other words, by mystical body, they understood as the spiritual union with Christ and Christians.  Also, they said that the term was too much metaphoric.
To correct the over-sided views of some theologians in regards to the theology of the mystical body and also to put an end the ecclesiology of the Counter Reformation, Pope Pius 12 elaborated in his Encyclical “Mystical Corporis” the clear understanding of the Church which we find in Vatican II as well. He started saying that the idea of the Church as body is scriptural (cf MCC 13, 14). To be a body, it has to be visible, undivided and concrete. It is mystical because the ecclesial ministers are acting the person of Christ who is the head of the Body, the Church (cf MCC 25). This is the clear shift from the ecclesiology of the Counter Reformation. Also, in response to the extremity of some theologians, the pontiff said that both are to be balanced; In the Eucharist, Christians are in union with Christ through the Holy Spirit. The pope added that this relationship is fulfilled by the incarnation whereby man could partake the divine nature through grace.
Among theologians, another polemic rose on who could get the full membership of the Church. Would it be only for those who were rightly baptized according to the Catholic faith? Or also for those of good will and perfect the life of Christ? The encyclical father answered to these questions saying that there are three conditions to fulfill the membership of the Church: baptism, faith and adherence to the ecclesial authority. These are just visible conditions in order to be member of the visible Church. The pope added that salvation can reach even those who do not fulfill the above conditions for Christ came for all people. Therefore, the Church is extended beyond its visible boundary. McGovern summarizes this encyclical’s position saying “It is not within man’s power to establish a permanent relationship with God. The grace of God must, therefore, be the source of this ordination and so constitutive of a membership”[2] (cf MCC 96). Thus, people outside the Church belong also to the mystical body of Christ but “they are deprived of the enjoyment of many privileges and graces proper to the member visibly united with the Catholic Church”[3].
Bibliography
McGovern, J. O., The Church in the Churches, Corpus Instrumentorium, Inc. Washington, 1968.


[1] - cf J. O. McGovern, The Church in the Churches,  p.19 - 38
[2] - J. O. McGovern, The Church in the Churches, p.31
[3] - J. O. McGovern, The Church in the Churches, p.33

****

Relationship between the Church and the Eucharist according to the Ecclesia de Eucharistia
The relationship between Church and Eucharist is explicitly expressed in the Encyclical: “The Eucharist builds the Church and the Church makes the Eucharist” (EE 26). Both are centered in Christ, founded by his redemptive acts. This is why we call the Eucharist as “sacrifice” because through his sacrifice, Christ redeemed the World and founded the Church. At the same time, we do repeat during our celebration of the Eucharist that we celebrate the death and resurrection of Christ when we are celebrating the Eucharist. Thus, the term Eucharist sacrificial derives from the fact that we commemorate the sacrificial salvation of Christ during the Holy Mass. We find this in the word of Christ himself during the institution of the Eucharist; he said “This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins” (Mat. 26, 28). Therefore, the Eucharist is not a mere remembrance of the past events. It does make the salvation present.
Through the Eucharist – the gift of Christ par excellence- the Church is revitalized and nourished (cf E.E 11). It brings an “interior growth within the Christian community” (EE 10). Christians find the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist and it is his real Body because he said so. “Take, eat; this is my body." (Mat 26, 26)[1]. Those who are invited to take and eat the Body of Christ share also his life. “It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me” (Gal 2, 20). Thus, full communion is established for those who partake the Eucharist. Moreover, the Eucharist is a “banquet of communion with Lord’s body and blood” (E.E 12).When we are receiving the Eucharist, we are in communion with one another, with Christ, and with the Spirit (E.E17). But above all we are in communion with the Father because the three persons of the Holy Trinity are involved in the salvation of human race which is expressed in the Eucharist. (We refer to it as Economic Trinity).
Jesus instituted the Eucharist as “sign and instrument of ecclesial communion”[2]. The Eucharist builds the Church (EE 26). The foundations of the Eucharist and of the Church go back to the last supper of Jesus and his apostles during which he said “do it in remembrance of him”. Therefore, the gathering of Jesus’ followers (Church) has its raison d’ĂȘtre by the celebration of the Eucharist. This is why the Eucharist receives also the qualification of the Church as apostolic (cf EE 27 and 28). However, Eucharist does not mean Church.
The Holy Father brought another element in order to understand better the relationship between Church and the Eucharist. He said that it is to be understood in the same way that Mary related to the Word, incarnated in her womb. She was listening to God and obedient to Him. She carried with her the salvation of the World (cf EE, chapter 6). In the same way, the Church has to be obedient to Christ who said “Do this in memory of me”. Thus, celebrating the Eucharist is therefore a divine act through human beings who act in persona Christi (cf EE 29).
Bibliography
Kocholickal, G.,  “the concept of sacrament and the Church as sacrament, Class note, Tangaza College- The Catholic University of East Africa, Nairobi, 2013




[1] Bible, Revised Standard Version (RSV)
[2] . G. Kocholickal, “Ecclesiology”, Class notes
*****


The Church contains what it signifies and communicates what it contains
The Church is composed of two complementary and inseparable components that are visible and the invisible. The study of the Church reiterates that to separate the two leads us to an “eschatological nestorianism or ecclesiological monophysism”[1]. Knowing the importance of the two mentioned elements above, the Church also is viewed as an instrument of conferring the grace that it contains. The present reflection will lead us to discuss two fundamental questions that are: the content of the Church and the Church as means of communicating what it contains
To begin with, the Church is visible through its physical activities such as sacramental celebrations, creed, ecclesial teachings, liturgy, ecclesial organization or movements, devotional groups or charitable works. In addition to that, we know that the Church is also visible through its leaders, through all members that compose it. We refer to this visible aspect as the signum. Briefly, this element is crucial in identifying the Church of Christ for we cannot talk about Church without its tangible elements. Like the baptism, it is sacrament because of the matter and form that makes it be so. Above all, it points out something else which is beyond its physical appearance: union with Christ, salvation, grace, faith, etc.
            The second element that we associate with the Church is the invisible ones. These are about grace that we cannot physically prove its existence, although, the Church transmits it to us. The Holy Spirit that nourishes the Church cannot be measured nor proved by any materiel thing, but it works and sanctifies us. Faith is only seen through its activities in the life of the faithful. It is real and effective even though we cannot weigh it. The assembly of the faithful, gathered in the Church, is truly related to the Father in Jesus Christ, through the Holy Spirit. This relationship is not a physical one as we relate physically with our friends. But it is believed and preached by the Church. We have all experienced this relationship with God. The celebrations of the sacraments are at the same time celebration the victory of Christ over death through which salvation comes to us.
Therefore, it is worth to say that the activities of the Church offer something deeper than what is being celebrated.  Therefore, the Church is to communicate this invisible element. In the theological term, we refer to it as res.  The Church is a sacrament and mystery, human and divine, visible and invisible, earthly and heavenly. The two elements exist alongside to each other. For this reason, we define the Church as signum et res which is derived from the definition of the sacrament.
The Church can also be defined from its missionary character. It exists because of its mission. The Church, as sacrament, is to transmit what it contains. It is a living organism in sense that it continues the work entrusted by Christ to the Apostles. The Church communicates the invisible contents through the visible means. “It is a sign and instrument, that is of communion with God and unity among all” (LG1).
Bibliography
G. Kocholickal,  “the concept of sacrament and the Church as sacrament, Class note, Tangaza College- The Catholic University of East Africa, Nairobi, 2013




[1] . G. Kocholickal, “Ecclesiology”, Class notes

****

What is the origin and the fulfillment of the Church?[1]
According to the catechism of the Catholic Church, the Church is born from the fact that Jesus Christ gave totally his life for our salvation (C.C.C. 766). We celebrate this Christ’s self-giving act, in our liturgical celebrations, especially in the Holy Eucharist. Salvation of souls is the final goal of the Church as it is quoted in the last canon law of the Latin Church (canon 1752). In order to understand this concept of salvation which is the final act of Christ and of the Church, we have to know for which purpose we were created and to which destination the Church, the Body of Christ leads us.
To begin with, God has created us for a purpose. When we turned away from this divine plan, he did not leave us perished but, instead, he took us back to the path that he has prepared for us. The history of Israel testified how God took care of us. He chose this people among other nations. He gave them commandments, kings, land and blessings. He initiated covenants with them in spite of their infidelity to his love. The book of Exodus gives us a clear explanation of God’s faithfulness. He did not punish the chosen people even if they did turn against him (Ex. 32, 7-14 (RSV)). He showed them his love and forgiveness.
In Jesus Christ, nobody is excluded for “he is all and in all” (Colossians 3, 11). Salvation is fulfilled in his person. This is the climax of the God’s love for us because he gave us his son in whom he pleased (Luc 3, 22). The Canticle of Philippians continues to express this total love saying “Jesus did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men”.  (Phil. 2, 6-8). Christ is the “one Mediator and the unique way of salvation” that the Church preaches to all mankind (L.G. 14).
Liturgical celebrations, prayers, scriptural meditation, biblical sharing, devotional movements etc are offered to us as means of preaching, celebrating and attending this salvation. In addition to that, we also have the opportunity to choose our lives as to be religious, married or single. In all these ecclesial activities and choices, our final aim is salvation. This suggests that salvation is already there in the Church, daily celebrated in the sacraments but yet, it is to be fulfilled at the second coming of Christ. It is present but not yet fully obtained. This is the eschatological character of salvation. In fact, in the final day, we will attend the eternal plan of God for which we were created. For this reason, the compendium of the catechism of the Catholic Church says clearly that “the Church finds her origin and fulfillment the eternal plan of God” (Compendium-  149).
The Holy Spirit makes this fulfillment of salvation possible to mankind. Through Her, we become “adopted children and heirs of his eternal happiness” (Compendium - 1)
In conclusion, the Church is the sacrament of salvation as we found in Lumen Gentium 48. Without salvation, she loses her raison d’ĂȘtre. She finds her essence in Jesus Christ who is the salvation itself. Thus, salvation is the origin and the fulfillment of the Church.
Bibliography
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, compendium, Paulines publication, Nairobi, 2006.




[1] - The Catechism of the Catholic Church, compendium, number 149


According to Africae Munus, why do reconciliation, peace and justice reflect the African’s commitment to the Lord Jesus Christ?

Randrianjanakolona Harivola Jose


“Africa’s commitment to the Lord Jesus Christ is a precious treasure …. Africa is led to explore its Christian vocation more deeply”[1]. From these first sentences of the post Synodal apostolic exhortation “Africae Munus”, we can already deduce that Africa has a significant role in the Universal Church. Above all, the vocation of the Church in African is to witness its being “salt and light” of the world. (A.M. 3).
As we have seen in class, one of the definitions of the Church can be drawn from its missionary character. The Church is to witness in the society where it is found (A.M... 130) and “to be ready to give a reason for the hope she bears within her” (A.M. 30). I would add that the Church, especially in Africa has to borrow the exemplary lives of the prophets, like Amos who dealt with injustice and corruption in the society. He had no fear to denounce the exploitation of the poor luxury, corruption and injustice (Am. 2, 6; 8, 4-7).  
 “Africae Munus” recognizes cultures, religious experiences, intellectuals, philosophy as treasures of African people. It continues arguing that these values should help the Church in spreading the Christ’s message (A.M. 36). In addition to this, the fathers of the synod emphasized that listening to the Word of God and having a profound prayer should be part of African Christian life. This is how Christians can be nourished in fulfilling their mission or commitment. (A.M. 54). And at the same time, they can be reconciled with God and with one another (A.M. 169). Consequently, Christians’ exemplary lives will affect the life of the society where they are found. Reconciling with God and neighbor is the key of building true society as the Africae Munus affirms “Indeed, only authentic reconciliation can achieve lasting peace in society” (A.M. 21). This message is not addressed only to Christians but to all Africans because building an authentic and peaceful society is a responsibility of each and every one whether he or she is Christian or not.
Moreover, the message of Christ is not restricted to the Church members or the hierarchical authorities. It is a message addressed to all people without distinction. Therefore, the Christ’s message should reach people’s life. In this regards, Africae Munus continues successively mentioning the area on which we are to be committed such as care of life, respect of the environment, dialogue with other religions, rightly rule in the society, value of the family, help and strength of the weak and the vulnerable in the society.
 In conclusion, the mission of Church should be identical to Jesus’. Jesus was preaching the inclusiveness of the Kingdom of God. He was so much committed that he broke all boundaries of race, color, religion, sex, and so on.  In his messages, Jesus intended a peaceful society. The African Church is to follow the footsteps of her Master. Also, the Holy Spirit whom Jesus gave to his disciples should the one who leads the Church in Africa in its mission. This is why African Christian should be committed towards reconciliation, justice and peace. This is why Pope Benedict XVI invites us saying “Get up, Church in Africa…” (A.M. 173).
Bibliography:
Benedict XVI, Post-synodal Apostolic Exhortation “Africae Munus”, on Africa’s commitment (20th November 2011) Nairobi: Paulines, 2011.



[1] Cf Africae Munus, introduction. 

No comments:

Post a Comment