Friday, March 8, 2013

Reflections on the Church - Tukamushaba Lawrence - 11094


 THE CHURCH AND OTHER RELIGIONS IN RELATION TO THE SALVATION According to Dominus Iesus, DI)
By Tukamushaba Lawrence: Reg no 11094T

On 6, August 2000, the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith under Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger with the approval of Pope John Paul II published a declaration “Dominus Iesuson the salvific universality of Jesus Christ and the mission of the Church. The aim of the declaration is mentioned in the conclusion number 23 as “reiterating and clarifying certain truths of the faith… and to give reasons for hope in a way that is convincing and effective”.   The declaration begins by explaining the origins the Church’s mandate to proclaim the kingdom as Jesus Christ’ sending of the apostles “Go into the whole world and proclaim the gospel to all creatures. He who believes and is baptized will be saved; he who does not believe will be condemned” Mk 16:15-16.  It’s from the mandate and powers given to the apostles (the first leaders of the church) that the Church receives its universal mission to continue proclamation the gospel everywhere. This mission has been carried on from the time of the apostles till today.
The Church and other religions in regard to salvation
The declaration categorically, emphasised the position of Vatican II (Lumen Gentium number 8) that the Church is extremely necessary for salvation. It says; “It must be believed that the Church a pilgrimage now on earth is necessary for salvation. The one Christ is the mediator the way of salvation; he is present to us in body which is the church” DI number 20. The Church has full means of salvation which is offered by Christ its head. Christ founded the Church and he is the head and the Church is his body. This does not mean that those out the Church cannot attain salvation. The declaration acknowledges that salvation outside the Church through Christ is possible because Christ is the universal saviour.  “Salvific action of Jesus Christ, with and through his spirit extends beyond the boundaries of the Church to all humanity” (DI 12). Through the magesterium we learn that the Spirit of Christ is present and active in all humanity in history, cultures and different religions. Further in same declaration number 20 states that; “Those who are not formally and visibly members of the Church, salvation is accessible by the virtue of grace which, while having relationship while having mysterious relationship to the Church does not make them part of the Church”. Jesus offered himself on the cross for all and from his death and resurrection salvation was made possible for all. However one cannot conclude that since some elements   of salvation can be found in other religions then we have no need to belong since we can be saved outside the Church.  Thinking in that line is a grave mistake the declaration affirms connection between the salvation and Church. “... the fullness of Christ’s salvific mystery belongs also to the Church, inseparable united to her Lord. Indeed, Jesus Christ continues his work of salvation in the church and by means of the Church” (DI 16). We enter into full communion with God through the son and in cooperation with the holy spirit.  The triune operates through “the single Church of Christ, which subsists in the Catholic governed by the Successor of Peter and by bishops in communion with him” (DI 17). By arriving at this understanding, the Church does not intend to disrespect people of other religions nor does she intend to down upon elements of salvation in other religions. The Church gives respect to every human person made in the image and likeness of God. The intention is to show how salvation brought by Christ is fully present in the Catholic Church which he founded. However the Church believes that .Though salvation through Jesus Christ is possible for everyone, it is not automatic. Christ plays his part of availing his grace and in turn we have to respond in words and deeds by living the beatitudes Mt 5:1-11. The declaration rules out also the culture of relativism, the mentality of looking at one religion as equally good others. As members of body of Christ we are privileged to know and to encounter trinity in our daily lives and most importantly in the celebration of Sacraments.  We have a duty to share and to proclaim the good news of salvation to all those who have not yet known the truth. For “God desires all men to be saved and come to the knowledge of truth” (1 Tim 2:4) DI 22 In today’s world of religious pluralism, indifference, relativism and science it is more necessary than ever before to proclaim the universal salvation that Jesus Christ offers through his only Church.

***
THE CALL FOR CHRISTIAN UNITY (UT UNUM SINT, UUS)
By Tukamushaba Lawrence: Reg no 11094T. Steam B
It was Jesus’ prayer that his followers may live in unity “ and I have given them the glory you gave me, that they may be one, as we are one” (Jn 17:22)  and that we love one another as he has have loved us (Jn 15:12,17). Along the path in history of the Church this way was abandoned.  Schism and divisions ensured in Christianity until today. Vatican council II called for Christian Unity and emphasised the Church’s commitment to ecumenism. John Paul II in his Encyclical Ut Unum Sint published in 1995 explored in great depths the whole issue of Christian Unity (ecumenism).
 In the introduction the Pope explains the shared ground that these Christian Churches have in common; the lifeless witness given by many martyrs both Catholics and the separated Churches. Here we can talk of the martyrs of Uganda. Some of them were Anglicans. In fact the site where they were burnt belongs to the Anglicans. When Pope Paul VI visited Uganda in 1969, beside the Catholic Martyrs shrine he also visited and prayed at the Anglican site where both Anglican and Catholic martyrs were burn alive. Today the Anglican Church which never   commemorated Martyrs day now commemorates the feast the same day as the Catholic Church on 3rd June Because of the historical Visit of Pope Paul VI.                                                               
     The Pope also talks of burdens of long standing misgivings inherited from the past and mutual misunderstandings and prejudices, complacency, in difference and insufficient knowledge of one another” (UUS 2). The way to overcome this is to acknowledge them as past mistakes and to use them as the starting point for a new orientation of Unity.  Aware of her own weaknesses the Catholic Church committed herself to the new path of Ecumenism at the Vatican council.
The basis for Christian unity
 The basis for Christian unity is the Trinity. “The faithful are one because, in the spirit, they are in communion with the son and, and in him, share the communion with the father; our fellowship is with the father and his son Jesus Christ”. (UUS No 9). This means that the followers of the Christ have belief in one God who calls them to be of one heart and soul (Acts 4; 32). Christ the lord of all Churches challenges the existence of disunity and calls his followers to take to heart his message of Unity (that they may be one Jn 17:22). Moreover Vatican II recognized the elements of salvation that exists outside the Catholic Church structures by stating that: “the Church of Christ subsists in the Catholic Church, which is governed by the successor of Peter and by the bishops in communion with him and at the same time acknowledges that many elements of sanctification and of truth that can be found outside her visible structures” (UUS no 10). This means that salvation is not entirely limited the Catholic Church alone. It’s the role of the Catholic Church to work with other churches for the salvation of all humanity.  The Pope admits that although the Church has preserved unity for many centuries, the Church too has contributed to the breakaway of some ecclesial communities. Working for Unity does not necessarily mean agreeing on same doctrines, or agreeing to the supremacy of the bishop of Rome or forming one Church. It is simply accepting and recognizing the root cause of disunity so that a common ground can be arrived at in mutual dialogue, and understanding.
  Some of the fruits of the ecumenical movement since Vatican council II have been in rediscovering oneness the (brotherhood). The attitude of looking at non Catholic Christians as heretics and enemies has significantly changed. We now look at them as our brothers and sisters. We no longer refer to them as separated brethrens but as “other Christians” (UUS no 41). Christians from various denominations are already working together at various levels. For example they have worked together on discussions on some theological issues, Bible Exegesis and translations, in medical and health fields, joint Christian declarations and in humanitarian aid. Between the mainstream churches, there are certain issues that both churches agree upon. That is Baptism, Eucharist and ministry and authority (UUS no 78), this is a big step towards Christian Unity. In order to continue strengthening the bonds that are already in existence, there are areas that need to be paid more attention as pointed out in (UUS79) that I think that are very fundamental. They are; relationships between scripture and tradition, Eucharist as a sacrament of real sacrifice of body and blood of Jesus, Ordination as a sacrament to three fold ministry of Episcopate, Presbyterate and diaconate, the Magisterium of the church, entrusted to the Pope and the bishops in communion with him and the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God and icon of the Church the spiritual mother who intercedes for Christ’s disciples and all humanity. There are still divergent views regarding the understanding of the above areas that are the major challenge to full unity.
Finally the work of rebuilding Christian unity that was emphasized by Vatican council II remains part of the mission of Catholic Church spearheaded by the Bishop of Rome. All Christian are called upon to work for togetherness and oneness. Pope Francis has begun well his pontificate by calling for unity and tolerance for humanity. It is only by living in unity and harmony that the God of love and peace dwells among us.

***

THE CHURCH AS A FAMILY OF GOD (ECCLESIA IN AFRICA)
By Tukamushaba Lawrence REG NO 11094T Stream B.
The first African Synod of Bishops took place in April 1994 in Rome. The synod was convoked in preparation for the celebration of 2000 years Jubilee of Christianity. The following year 1995 Pope John Paul II came to Africa to deliver the Post Synodal Apostolic Exhortation “Ecclesia in Africa.  In their prayer, discussions and deliberations, the Synod Fathers’ noted that the: “main question facing the Church in Africa was consisting in delineating as clearly as possible what it is and what it must fully carry out, so that its message may be relevant and credible”  (propostio23and 24) While discerning on the credible and what the church in Africa should be that to be a sacrament of unity of all humanity, the ideal image of the extended family of God in Africa was suitable.
They wished the African Church to be one family of God, that  walks together in joys and sorrows, a family that is in solidarity with  the universal Church, that dialogues and eventually a Church that is self reliant  in terms of personnel and material. This would be the ideal principles for new evangelization.
It should be noted that in African family, values of love, trust solidarity, sharing, care for the widows, the orphans and the weak, dialogue and cooperation are highly cherished.  In this case the African family as a visible sign of Christ that is beyond traumatic experience of tribalism, regionalism and gender discrimination that sometimes exists in our African continent. In this way the local church would be:   
o   A Church lived and experienced in Christian communities. Communities that pray and share the word of God together and radiate Christ’s love and as well as engaging in self evangelization. Here the idea of the Church in neighbourhood (small Christian communities) fits in well. The Church that begins at family level and moves upward to the wider church.
o   The family of God that lives in dialogue. As a family that practices dialogue within its boundaries that is; between priest and pastoral workers in the diocese, between local churches between conferences of Bishops of different nations, between different rites among others. The bishops were to put in place structures that enable smooth interaction in the Church. Beyond church structures it was to be a family of God that embraces people from other faiths. Dialogue and solidarity goes hand in hand. The Church in Africa would be a church that lives in solidarity with other Churches in the World. In this way they are able to share in solidarity with the disadvantaged Churches. For example Churches in war torn areas could be supported with personnel and material needs as was a case for Rwanda after genocide when the neighbouring churches in neighbouring countries mobilized both personnel and material goods to help in re-establishing the Church.
o   The Church that lives in communion with the whole Church. The Church that lives in full communion with the universal church under the leadership of the bishop of Rome while at the same time preserving its own rich traditions.
o   As a family of God had to be self reliant. This is  in terms of both material and personnel. For many years, majority of the clergy and religious have been from the West. Also most of the Church’s activities have been dependent on western donations and charity. As a family of God, dioceses have to find means of mobilizing resources the Church needs carry out its mission. 
Finally the Ideal image of the church in Africa as a family of God is being realized through strengthening small Christian communities, forming of associations like Association of Member Episcopal Conference of Eastern Africa (AMECIA), Bishop’s Conference of Africa and Madagascar (SECAM). However this vision of Bishops is not yet a true reality. The Church still suffers setbacks of tribalism in some countries and minimal self support.

****

THE CHURCH AS AN INSTRUMENT OF ECUMENISM AND INTERRELIGIOUS DIALOGUE (AFRICAE  MUNUS)
By Tukamushaba Lawrence: Reg NO 11094T Stream B.

Ecumenism and dialogue with people of other faith is one of central aspects of Reconciliation Justice and Peace in Africa as emphasised in the Post Synodal Apostolic exhortation (Africae Munus). For many centuries, the Church took for granted doing ecumenism and dialoguing with believers of other religions until the second Vatican II. Vatican Council II opened the Church’s doors to a mutual understanding with people of other faiths. Since then, the Church has committed itself to reach out to other religions in its teaching and above all to cooperate with them in all matters of great importance to humanity. This is evidenced by many ecumenical groups and inter-religious councils that the many Catholic members both lay, clerical and religious are involved in.  The presence of representatives from various protestant Churches and above all the patriarch Abuna Paulos of the Ethiopian Orthodox church is clear manifestation of path to Christian unity. The African Synod (4-25 October 2009) reflected deeply on this issue and reaffirmed its commitment to ecumenism and dialogue as a path to reconciliation, Justice and Peace on the African continent that is torn by wars, tribalism, corruption, poverty and income inequalities.
It is said that Africa has the fastest growing number of religions in the world; that is Christian Pentecostals and evangelical, Islam and African traditional religions. These pose challenges to the Church and the Church is not sure how to respond pastorally to this new phenomenon as Benedict XVI noted. “The Church is asking question on the emergency and growth of non Catholic Churches sometimes known as independent churches”. Most of these churches, target to criticize and discredit the institution and doctrines of the Catholic Church in attempt to win some members into their sects. They take advantage of poverty, poor social conditions, unemployment and all such desperate situations to draw people into their churches. The Church is losing many members to all sorts of new sects around Africa.
Today, Islam has penetrated even in rural communities which were predominantly christian. Mosques are now spread all over even in remote villages where they never used to be. I know members of one family each belonging to different religions. In such case dialogue and co-existence is fundamental.
There is also revival of traditional religion and witchcraft. When I was doing pastoral work I heard of many people accused of witchcraft or teaching the young ones witchcraft.  This makes people to live in fear, anxiety about health, wellbeing and this has resulted into syncretism for some Christians. Competition for flocks among these religious grouping has resulted into conflicts and sour relationships the least expected of any worthy religion. For the Christian communities “a divided Christianity remains a scandal, since it de facto contradicts the will of the Divine master (cf.Jn17:21)” [1] The Church finds itself in a challenging situation on how to respond to this new challenge. Christian churches have to get their self-righteous and pride to reach out to the other and then be able to bring about the Kingdom of God as we normally pray in the Lord’s Prayer “May your kingdom come”.  Pope Benedict XVI calls upon the “whole ecclesial family, institutes of consecrated life, lay movements as well as lay associates” to use all available avenues to promote unity among all the people.  The Pope also acknowledged the difficulties, injustice and hostility the minority Christians face in Islamic nations. Still he observes that the Church in her social apostolate “does not make religious distinctions. She comes to help those in need, be they Muslim or animists” In doing this she bears witness to the love of God the Creator of all and invites followers of other religions to do the same. Today it is proving very difficult for Missionaries to get Visas and work permits to countries of Maghreb and Sudan. I know some members of the society of Missionaries of Africa who has failed to get visas or has left these counties because their Visas are expired and cannot be renewed. A few Christians living in such countries are discriminated and treated as second class citizens and in most cases they live in fear. Nevertheless, the Pope invited the Church to patiently continue to dialogue and to seek if possible “juridical and practical recognition of religious freedom”
Lastly we are living in a world of religious pluralism which presupposes mutual understanding and religious tolerance to co-exist with people of other faiths.




[1][1] Africae munus 45

***

THE DOUBLE FACE OF THE CHURCH
In the recent times, a number of people have come to question the validity of the Church. The question normally asked is; Jesus preached the kingdom so why do we have the church? Is the Church important for our salvation? More over there are many people seeking God, fulfilment in life outside the walls of the Church. Humanist’s movement is a good example. Questions raised are genuine and practical. The critiques see the church as “a compromised institution one with much blood on its hands, spiritual fat on its body and too many skeletons in its closet”[1] This stems from the fact the Church has had both its dark side and bright side and many people can’t imagine that all terrible scandals and abuses are part of an institution founded by Christ. We need to remember that since the time of Jesus began scandals have been there. Some people saw his association with the sinners and tax collectors as a scandal. His death on the cross between two thieves was the worst scandal that could happen to a Messiah. The first Christian community was seen as a cult whose acts and celebration were viewed as intolerable thus they were accused and persecuted of cannibalism, incest among others. With the conversion of emperor like Nero now Christians were persecuted by Christians. The Church has throughout history continued to be plunged in various scandals the recent ones being sexual abuses of the minors by some clerics. All these have left many people wondering whether this is the same Church which Jesus intended. With many unanswered questions, many people have become very anti Church, atheist humanists do not want to hear anything to do with the Church.  Does that mean that such people do not believe in God? What I have realized is that some do believe in God implicitly. There many people want identify themselves with the Church or they want to see the Church continue though themselves not want to be its members. Others would like to see a reformed Church that addresses all the challenges we have in the society, something that will only happen probably in eschatological times. Some people want the kingdom but not the institutional Church. The Church may have water of life but less and less people want drink from it.
How should we understand the Church? Three points will help us to understand the Church, that is; the Church as people, the Church as community with defects and the church as a community with a common mission.
(a)The Church as people- Apostolic community
Notwithstanding, the Church is not only structures, the hierarchy leadership but the Church is the community of people. Jesus gathered around him a community of disciples whom he formed, instructed, and left them with his word and the sacrament of Eucharist which is a link between them and God. The first Christian community like us was not perfect. They came from different background, had different temperaments and personalities.  Sometimes they were jealousy of each other and had inner circles in the same company of Jesus as scriptures tell us (the sons of Zebedee). That did not deter them from becoming companions of Jesus. Sometimes we attend Church looking for friends, people with same interest like us, looking for company and yes; spiritual nourishment. If the church fails to meet our objectives, we get disappointed. As a community of believers built on the person of Jesus not people with same preferences, tastes or social status we ought “to stand shoulder to shoulder and hand in hand with people who are different from ourselves, and with them, hear a common word, say a common creed, share common bread, offer mutual forgiveness so as in way to bridge our differences and become a common heart”[2] It’s about being able to transcend our human limitations and being united by the bond of Jesus.
(b). A community clothed with the spirit of Jesus Christ.
 In the gospel of John (20:19) and the Acts of the Apostles (2:1) we are told that the apostles were frightened and lonely locked themselves inside the house.  Although they were in the same room, they were not a community; they became a community after being clothed with the Holy Spirit that released them from their loneliness. Even when they went apart on mission they were united at heart. It is the power of the Spirit that bonds and unites a community of the apostles together not when frightened gang together.
(c) A community with a common mission.
 Any community of the followers of Jesus ought to have a shared and common mission. The mission of inclusivity, that embraces people from all walks of life for the shared mission. The basis of any ecclesial Church/community is to be centred on the person of Jesus and living in his Spirit. He showed us how to live in Spirit; in charity, joy, peace, patience, goodness, fidelity among others.  Living in Spirit knows no race, colour, social status, creed and past background. When we live these virtues we become one body, one earth and one church.




[1] Cf, R, ROLHEISER.,The Holy longing, the search for a Christian Spirituality, 112.
[2] Cf.R,ROLSHEISER The Holy longing, The search for Achristian Spirituality 115 

No comments:

Post a Comment